Diagnosis
Recurrent lumbar disc herniation at L5-S1, illustrated in Figure 3 of Choi et al. (2016).
Procedure and level
Revision biportal endoscopic discectomy. L5-S1: one treated motion segment.
Surgical levels and level count
- Treated levels
- 1 level
- L5-S1
- Decompression
- 1 level
- L5-S1
- New fusion
- None described
Figure 3 identifies one recurrent disc level, L5-S1. This is a publication-derived case; individual operator attribution is not established.
One level means one treated motion segment, such as L4-L5. Decompression and fusion can overlap; their counts are not added. Counts follow the source description and have not been re-audited against private charts.
Clinical presentation
The published example documents recurrence seven months after open microdiscectomy.
Neurologic findings
Not reported in the available source.
Prior nonoperative treatment
Not reported in the available source.
Imaging and clinical concordance
Figure 3 follows initial herniation, postoperative imaging, recurrence, and imaging after revision.
Reasoning recorded for the procedure
The report discusses reaching recurrent disc material through a scarred field while limiting additional facet removal.
Operative considerations
The technical report describes identifying bone before releasing adhesions and removing the recurrent fragment.
Postoperative course
Individual long-term functional outcomes are not supplied for the illustrated case.
Postoperative imaging
The figure describes decompression and preservation of the facet after revision. Imaging does not establish symptom recovery.
Educational point
Compare the anatomical target before and after revision. This single published example cannot establish comparative safety or effectiveness.
Published images and video
Media are identified by their public source. Journal figures open at the original source; operative video illustrates a technical example. Imaging and operative appearances do not measure pain relief, function, or durable fusion.
Open Figure 3 at the original publication →
The original figure is not reproduced or relabelled as a new institutional case.
Reported observations and missing data
Values below are limited to what the identified public source reports; source charts were not re-audited for this website update. Operative-time definitions and observation windows may differ. Do not compare these values across surgeons or procedures.
- Operative time
- Not reported in the available educational summary.
- Estimated blood loss
- Not reported in the available educational summary.
- Hospital stay
- Not reported in the available educational summary.
- Complications
- Not reported in the available educational summary.
- Follow-up interval
- Not reported in the available educational summary.
- Validated patient-reported outcome scores
- Not reported in the available educational summary.
Evidence and further reading
These sources provide clinical context. They are separate from the source records for this case and do not verify its outcome.
Coauthored publication · technical report
Biportal Endoscopic Spinal Surgery for Recurrent Lumbar Disc HerniationsChoi DJ, Jung JT, Lee SJ, Kim YS, Jang HJ, Yoo B. Clin Orthop Surg. 2016;8(3):325–329.
A published technical discussion of biportal revision discectomy, scar dissection, and preservation of remaining stabilizing structures.
Applicability: This report concerns recurrent disc herniation. It does not establish the benefit of revision fusion or validate outcomes in the cases on this website.
Source, authorship, and limitations
Source material: Choi et al., Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery (2016), Figure 3. An educational synopsis of the published Figure 3 case. Han-Jin Jang is a coauthor; the publication does not establish that he personally performed this patient's procedure. Publication consent and clinical review are governed by the source journal. The original figure remains on the publisher/PMC page. This entry was organized on 2026-09-11; this date records a website update, not a new clinical review.
Selection is educational. No population denominator, consecutive recruitment process, comparative group, or complete follow-up dataset is supplied. A missing complication field does not mean that no complication occurred. Published observations do not predict another patient's outcome.
No new private patient files were added in this update. Corrections and future clinical additions follow the editorial policy.
Suggested citation: Hanjin Jang, MD academic case collection. L5-S1 Recurrent Disc Herniation: Published Revision Case. Casebank, Case 09. Updated 2026-09-11. https://www.hanjinjangspine1.com/casebank/published-l5s1-recurrent-disc-revision